Ukrainian army destroys 16 Russian tanks and kills 64 invaders on the southern front

Ukrainian artillery and rocket units carry out 550 fire missions on enemy targets

Read also: Ukrainian army repels enemy attacks near three settlements, Russia sends cadets to war – General Staff

The Ukrainian Air Force inflicted nine airstrikes on enemy positions during the day of October 1. Ukrainian artillery and rocket units carried out 550 fire missions, the command said.

Read also: Ukrainian exports to Europe have almost recovered to pre-war levels, but world exports have been cut in half

In just one day, Ukrainian defenders eliminated:

  • 64 Russian invaders;

  • an ammunition depot;

  • two Msta-S self-propelled howitzers;

  • two anti-tank missile systems;

  • 16 tanks;

  • 11 armored vehicles.

Read also: EU human rights agency interviews people fleeing war in Ukraine

At the same time, the Russian invaders launched seven airstrikes on Ukrainian Armed Forces positions and used multiple rocket launcher systems to hit the Nikopol district.

The Russians also fired on the town of Ochakiv twice a day, using a 120 mm mortar and a Grad multiple rocket launcher.

Read the original article at The new voice of Ukraine

One thought on “Ukrainian army destroys 16 Russian tanks and kills 64 invaders on the southern front”
  1. OVI charges neccesitate all of the expert methods used in criminal courts. Defending a DWI begins by making sure none of your rights on the constitution were abused. Because a cop is in front of you, and they are essentially the only witnesses most of the time, the directives and MO is of the formula. some of us all create accidents, and the law are no exception. The Occasion begins with usual suspicion that will progress to obvious cause. For example, you get forced over for driving too slow at 1 a.m.. A officer has regular suspicion that someone has created a traffic offense, swerving. Now, when the police tries to make eye contact or leans in towards the automobile, they will remark you posess watery eyes, or there is an odor of beer. This elevates the acceptabel intuition of recklessness to providing the cop a reason that you may be crusing around while intoxicated. eighty% of cops will say odor of liquor, red eyes, or sloppy speech. They will usually say you were rumaging around trying to get your drivers license and proof of insurance out. At this point someone is likely told to step out from the vehicle and do universal field sobriety checks. These are SFST’s are taught under NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) regulations and need to be followed per instruction. when you do perform the checks, the officer may make mistakes which will have the test, or tests thrown out of from evidence. Factors such as physical impairments and optimal situational conditions can be integrated amoung the results of your performance. (i.e. you can’t perform a hop and a skip and pivot check on ramped stret). Someone may usually take a digital breath tests. There are irregularities in these devices as well, after all they are technolgo that need to be maintained and training on all the time. The incarceration is taped at the instance the cop turns on their sirens. Through this taped evidence we are able to inform an experienced opinion if the cops giving of the tests, to the clients performance taking the tests. If you consent to the checks or not, one will go to lock up. If you have been arrested for OVI or any criminal charges or know some one who needs a criminal defense Lawyer visit my site rgiht here ovi lawyer in fairfield best regards

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.